- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

New uses for old drugs offer promise

hen computer scientist Matthew Might was trying to find a treatment for his son Bertrand, he used his digital skills to simulate how 200,000 drugs might act on a genetic mutation that had left the boy with seizures, developmental delays and, oddly, an inability to cry tears.

It appeared 70 of the drugs might have some benefit, 15 were already approved for use in the U.S., and one worked in a lab model of the genetic fluke.

That one turned out to be the antacid Prevacid, and soon after he started giving it to Bertrand his seizures improved. A second drug, used to treat osteoarthritis and inflammatory bowel disease, allowed the boy to cry real tears for the first time.

The drugs ultimately couldn’t save Bertrand’s life. He died last year shortly before his 13th birthday.

But it showed the power of using already-approved drugs to treat rare disease.

The simple concept has been used many times before.

Viagra, the erectile dysfunction drug, originally was developed to treat hypertension. The morning sickness treatment thalidomide, famously taken off the market when it caused horrible birth defects, was resurrected as a therapy for multiple myeloma and leprosy. Remdesivir, intended to treat Ebola, was effective at treating patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Even if these drugs hadn’t worked, conditions like erectile dysfunction and COVID-19 are common enough that there’s a financial incentive to keep companies looking for treatments.

But for a disease like the one that struck Bertrand and only about a dozen others worldwide, there are no other options. For patients with extremely rare diseases, repurposing existing drugs may be their only

Dr. David Fajgenbaum is building on that hope.

Eight years ago, he repurposed a kidney transplant drug to save his own life.

“When I was so sick and running out of time, I knew I couldn’t develop a new drug, but I knew that there were 2,500 drugs already approved,” said Fajgenbaum, who has a lethal autoimmune disease called Castleman. “It was my only chance.”

Now an assistant professor and associate director of the University of Pennsylvania’s Orphan Disease Center, Fajgenbaum is trying to make the process of repurposing drugs easier.

When I was so sick and running out of time, I knew I couldn’t develop a new drug, but I knew that there were 2,500 drugs already approved.

“How many other patients can benefit?” he asked himself after he realized his own treatment was working. “Can this process be scaled?”

Might, Fajgenbaum and a small number of others are trying to add structure to the process and make the path to find an effective treatment less dependent on sheer chance.

Rare diseases may affect only a small number of people each – by definition in the U.S., fewer than 200,000. But that adds up to about 1 in 10 people, and only about 5% of these diseases have an approved treatment.

For many, drugs may already exist for other diseases that could help – if they can find them.

Fajgenbaum said he’s motivated by the question: “What can we do to get these things that are usually found by luck to actually occur?”

Finding answers at the drugstore

When he realized his original treatment wasn’t helping him, Fajgenbaum was in medical school with a girlfriend he wanted to marry.

Like him, about two-thirds of the 30,000 Castleman’s patients in the United States aren’t successfully treated with approved therapies, and only 65% of patients with his subtype survive at least five years past their diagnosis.

Fajgenbaum didn’t like those odds.

He decided to use his medical training to track a slew of his own biological metrics, including his immune system activation as he recovered, stabilized and descended into the next Castleman’s crisis.

The first sign of decline appeared to be an activation of T cells, the soldiers of the immune system, as well as production of a protein called VEGF, which promotes blood vessel growth. Sirolimus, a drug used to prevent organ rejection after a kidney transplant, blocks both.

With support from his doctor, Fajgenbaum began treatment. Seven and a half healthy years later, he’s married with a toddler and a newborn, has written a book, “Chasing My Cure,” about his experiences, and now has the means to help others do what he did.

“Sirolimus is in every single drugstore in the country,” he said, but no one knew it could work. “How many more are there like this?”

Fajgenbaum, now 36, was lucky. The drug he needed was off-patent and cheap enough that his insurance company agreed to cover it.

But in many cases, insurers want more proof before forking over thousands or tens of thousands of dollars a year for therapy. Clinical trials offer that proof but typically run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

Companies aren’t willing to make those investments unless they have some hope of recouping them, which is hard to do with a small patient population.

If more money were available for clinical trials or a few small changes could allow a patent to be extended without expensive trials, the incentives might shift. More drugs might be repurposed, Fajgenbaum said.

“When you think about these drugs, they’ve already been shown safe, effective for something and are at your neighborhood pharmacy,” he said. “If you can make that link to another disease, you can change lives.”

Bridging the gaps

Cures within Reach, a Chicago nonprofit, has been funding drug repurposing research since 2008.

The organization is financing 34 clinical trials, 40% of which are in rare diseases, said president and CEO Barbara Goodman.

While many in the drug development world think only new drugs can be innovative, “we think it’s incredibly innovative to look at things that are already safe and effective and find out how many other ways we can test them in diseases and issues that don’t have options,” Goodman said.

Cures within Reach helps bridge the gap between an interesting laboratory finding and the need to prove it has enough promise by testing it in a small number of people.

At the University of Alabama at Birmingham, where Might directs the Hugh Kaul Precision Medicine Institute, he has designed a step-by-step process for patients called the Algorithm for Precision Medicine.

Analysts at the institute serve as biomedical research advisers to patients or foundations and help identify new uses for existing therapies.

Meanwhile at Penn, Fajgenbaum is trying to systematize the process of identifying approved drugs that might help those with rare diseases and overcoming at least the first hurdles for testing them in people. As he describes it, he’s helping “build out a map of the steps” needed to repurpose a drug and give rare disease groups a path forward.

“The first step is seeing what does the road look like,” he said.

A researcher on his team recently surveyed 190 rare-disease organizations, asking questions about drug repurposing. While 75% said they were interested, just a small fraction were actually doing it. Fajgenbaum and his colleagues are trying to figure out how to change that.

He fantasizes about having a repository – a library – where people could look up the functions of different drugs and match them to their needs. Missing a key protein? Here’s a drug that happens to turn up production of that same protein. Wondering if a drug has a specific effect?

“There’s no group tasked with finding those things and shepherding them forward,” he said. “If it turns out not to be effective, let’s take it off the list.”

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

Get in Touch


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

Latest Posts